Looking forward to hearing from you! :)
Monday, June 26, 2006
Teach with Tech PodCast
For those of you interested, I will be engaged in a PodCast with a talented Indiana University doctoral student, Chris Essex, who has an excellent podcast and blog (Teach with Tech) for those interested in teacher education. We will be talking about 50 Ways to Use Technology in your Classroom Tomorrow (which I'll be presenting at ICE - hopefully). I think it should be a very interesting show. If you have any suggestions of simple ways teachers can use technology in their classroom without a lot of training or hardship on the teacher, send them my way. My email is anne@purdue.edu
Looking forward to hearing from you! :)
Looking forward to hearing from you! :)
Dissertation Thoughts
So, for those of you who don't know, I've been starting work on my dissertation, which is investigating exemplary technology-using teachers (those recognized by an award called the MCOATT - Michigan Consortium for Outstanding Achievements in Teaching with Technology) and trying to find out what really makes these teachers so outstanding in hopes of duplicating these efforts through preservice education programs. Therefore, my three main areas of interest lie in their visions of technology integration, the strategies they use when integrating technology, and their developmental process towards exemplary technology integration. So far, I have found several themes (although I have yet to fully analyze the data), but it seems as though all teachers started with an interest in technology. Either someone showed them the possibilities of technology with their students, or they grew up with an interest in computers in general (typically the second). This doesn't provide much hope unless we can get teachers and future teachers interested in the actual technology first.
However, I must note that technology is a tool. But I still feel it to be a different tool than other pedagogical tools. For instance, like reading innovations, (guided reading, phonics, whole language, etc...) seem to pop-up every year. How are these types of innovations different than technology innovations? Why are some teachers likely to adopt certain reading innovations? IS technology so different because it changes at such a rapid rate? OR is it different because it can be integrated into all disciplines? It brings up the question of - should technology be considered a separate part of teacher education or should it be integrated into a teacher's pedagogy. From my perspective, it seems as though with these exemplary technology-using teachers (ETUTs) that they used the keyword "seamless". I was amazed at the effortless production of new technology integration ideas. Most teachers said, I can do this lesson or this lesson. Some even volunteered different ideas once I showed up and said
Another interesting thing is the commonalities between all the teachers. Their willining to first help with my project and open their classrooms up. They were all so motivated, excited, there was such energy in the room. It made me want to be in a classroom again! When we talked afterwards, I felt as though I was with kindred spirits - the excitement of talking about new technologies and how they could be used. Now, I don't necessarily believe that all teachers would get excited about this, but it brings up an excellent area of interest for me in my belief that brainstorming with other teachers and getting excited about new, creative ideas is a great way to keep teaching fresh, exciting, and innovative. Therefore, the collaboration between inservice teachers, preservice teachers, and universities should also be seamless. Through service learning and active learning communities, I believe we can improve not only teacher education, but K-12 education. I think this is the next step, and I intend to move my work in this direction in the up-and-coming years.
However, I must note that technology is a tool. But I still feel it to be a different tool than other pedagogical tools. For instance, like reading innovations, (guided reading, phonics, whole language, etc...) seem to pop-up every year. How are these types of innovations different than technology innovations? Why are some teachers likely to adopt certain reading innovations? IS technology so different because it changes at such a rapid rate? OR is it different because it can be integrated into all disciplines? It brings up the question of - should technology be considered a separate part of teacher education or should it be integrated into a teacher's pedagogy. From my perspective, it seems as though with these exemplary technology-using teachers (ETUTs) that they used the keyword "seamless". I was amazed at the effortless production of new technology integration ideas. Most teachers said, I can do this lesson or this lesson. Some even volunteered different ideas once I showed up and said
I can do it this way, or we could do this, or... What would you like to see?
Another interesting thing is the commonalities between all the teachers. Their willining to first help with my project and open their classrooms up. They were all so motivated, excited, there was such energy in the room. It made me want to be in a classroom again! When we talked afterwards, I felt as though I was with kindred spirits - the excitement of talking about new technologies and how they could be used. Now, I don't necessarily believe that all teachers would get excited about this, but it brings up an excellent area of interest for me in my belief that brainstorming with other teachers and getting excited about new, creative ideas is a great way to keep teaching fresh, exciting, and innovative. Therefore, the collaboration between inservice teachers, preservice teachers, and universities should also be seamless. Through service learning and active learning communities, I believe we can improve not only teacher education, but K-12 education. I think this is the next step, and I intend to move my work in this direction in the up-and-coming years.
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Service Learning - Where does this fall in education
As a graduate assistant for the Center for Instructional Excellence at Purdue University, I am currently attending Dr. Bob Bringle's presentation on Service Learning. It's really piqued my interest. I see extreme implications for education students. For the future, at IU, Dr. Reigeluth actually does service learning with Decatur Township. It's very interesting that faculty volunteer their services to attempt to redesign education. For me as well, I'm incredibly interested in engaging in service learning projects with IUPUI and giving our preservice teachers an opportunity to experience diverse learning experiences. Also, having our preservice teachers work with inservice teachers to help them design technology-enhanced lessons. This is a great opportunity for preservice teachers to learn how to design lessons, work with a teacher, gain feedback, and prepare instructional materials teachers need and can use. Perhaps even seeing the implementation of their instruction would be a great way to gain knowledge and skills. Reflection would be outstanding in this regard!
One thing he emphasized was that service learning has to be:
1. In the community.
2. In a course. Partnered with a course that students read material, engage in discussions, meet weekly (or more).
3. Connection between the two. This is often accomplished through reflections. Make sure that you directly draw on this experience and focus on it.
4. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AND TYPICALLY OVERLOOKED: Do you have educational objectives/goals for the course to develop civicly responsible and involved graduates?
Also, what's your definition of Service Learning? Is it co-curricular (including student activities) or just in courses? We really need to make an institutional decision. We can learn from Student Services on organizing, managing, etc... Alternative Spring Break tips are great opportunities - but this isn't necessarily service learning. There is no course or specific educational goals. OR a hybrid method of the idea, to tie this in with a course of some kind.
Different Types of Journals
Three-part = How's it relative to them as a person, community, professional growth?
Double sided = description on one side, reflections on other.
Highlighter = they have to highlight all the incidents they've learned about from the course.
Critical incident = focus on the critical incidents
Key words = tell them what "key words" they feel should be included
Service Learning is more work for the Faculty. More faculty-student and student-student interactions than typical courses. Set up community placements. It's additional work. You get evolution in the course.
Use the concepts to put on worksheets so they can relate these to their experiences. A consistent list of communities sources. They are let known that these students are not just there for volunteering - it's more.
Also, see his chart on management of placements. We need to see what the students' needs, activities, key persons, time table, etc....
For more information about this, see Campus Compact.
One thing he emphasized was that service learning has to be:
1. In the community.
2. In a course. Partnered with a course that students read material, engage in discussions, meet weekly (or more).
3. Connection between the two. This is often accomplished through reflections. Make sure that you directly draw on this experience and focus on it.
4. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AND TYPICALLY OVERLOOKED: Do you have educational objectives/goals for the course to develop civicly responsible and involved graduates?
Also, what's your definition of Service Learning? Is it co-curricular (including student activities) or just in courses? We really need to make an institutional decision. We can learn from Student Services on organizing, managing, etc... Alternative Spring Break tips are great opportunities - but this isn't necessarily service learning. There is no course or specific educational goals. OR a hybrid method of the idea, to tie this in with a course of some kind.
Different Types of Journals
Three-part = How's it relative to them as a person, community, professional growth?
Double sided = description on one side, reflections on other.
Highlighter = they have to highlight all the incidents they've learned about from the course.
Critical incident = focus on the critical incidents
Key words = tell them what "key words" they feel should be included
Service Learning is more work for the Faculty. More faculty-student and student-student interactions than typical courses. Set up community placements. It's additional work. You get evolution in the course.
Use the concepts to put on worksheets so they can relate these to their experiences. A consistent list of communities sources. They are let known that these students are not just there for volunteering - it's more.
Also, see his chart on management of placements. We need to see what the students' needs, activities, key persons, time table, etc....
For more information about this, see Campus Compact.
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
EDCI 270 - Large Lecture Technology Solutions
Yesterday, I gave a brief presentation on the different types of software that future teachers could consider using. Based on many of my free demo from MACUL, I was able to consider some of the more pertinent software for these students. A PodCast of the lecture is available via BoilerCast (March 20). I felt it went rather smoothly, although we did have one quick problem when accessing Google Earth and the computer went down. Luckily, Dr. Newby was able to tell a story about Google Earth, and I was able to call on one of my students from another class (Laura Goldin in EDCI 271) and we discussed how she used Google Earth in one of her practicums when students were studying Geology. The other software items I presented were Scholastic Keys, Online Frog Dissection, BrainPOP, and we briefly talked about software evaluation. One of the interesting things I love about this large lecture is the opportunity to reach so many potential teachers and therefore so many K12 students in the future. If I can change their minds about technology, think of how many more K12 students may be affected - and that's the entire purpose after all: to change and improve K12 education. At least that's why I went into this business. Large lectures (contrary to popular belief) do not have to always utilize the "Sage on Stage" approach. However, with 465 students in our large lecture each semester, it becomes difficult to be a "Guide on the Side". Here are some ways we've tried to solve that:
1. Lab Pockets in Lecture. We organize students in their lab sections in lecture so they have a smaller community within the large lecture. The lab TA sits with these students and uses a sign (mine is bright pink with sparkles) to let the students know where they are sitting. Students feel more comfortable asking questions, and we can have active small group discussions/activities with the lab TA and a smaller more manageable number of students.
2. Email Students. When a student participates in lecture, the TA sends Dr. Newby their name, email, and comment. Dr. Newby then emails the student to thank them and offer additional information on their comment. You wouldn't believe the impact - they act like someone famous has emailed them and they brag about it in their lab!
3. Videos on Basic Materials Ahead of Time. In order to engage in more applied knowledge (the whole point of education), Dr. Newby goes over his basic knowledge from the book in his "From The Author" video presentations. Students watch these before lecture and come prepared to discuss the material from the book and those videos. We apply that knowledge with some type of classroom activity.
4. Clickers. We use the clickers for more student interaction, polls, attendance, all sorts of things! Still technical problems, but we're working through them. We like to model as much technology integration as possible, as well as show them to have a back-up plan and be flexible. :)
I found a few other good ideas for technology integration in large lecture courses:
1. Lab Pockets in Lecture. We organize students in their lab sections in lecture so they have a smaller community within the large lecture. The lab TA sits with these students and uses a sign (mine is bright pink with sparkles) to let the students know where they are sitting. Students feel more comfortable asking questions, and we can have active small group discussions/activities with the lab TA and a smaller more manageable number of students.
2. Email Students. When a student participates in lecture, the TA sends Dr. Newby their name, email, and comment. Dr. Newby then emails the student to thank them and offer additional information on their comment. You wouldn't believe the impact - they act like someone famous has emailed them and they brag about it in their lab!
3. Videos on Basic Materials Ahead of Time. In order to engage in more applied knowledge (the whole point of education), Dr. Newby goes over his basic knowledge from the book in his "From The Author" video presentations. Students watch these before lecture and come prepared to discuss the material from the book and those videos. We apply that knowledge with some type of classroom activity.
4. Clickers. We use the clickers for more student interaction, polls, attendance, all sorts of things! Still technical problems, but we're working through them. We like to model as much technology integration as possible, as well as show them to have a back-up plan and be flexible. :)
I found a few other good ideas for technology integration in large lecture courses:
Friday, March 10, 2006
Convince Teachers: Notes for Future Presentation and Teaching
One very interesting tactic from a presenter at MACUL, he asked "Does anyone have a problem in your school?" I love this idea for me in terms of working with teachers. I feel that by asking teachers for their problems and showing them the possibilities of technology, it establishes me as a more credible source and shows them how to begin brainstorming about technology integration. Ideally, I would like to analyze the brainstorming process. What makes exemplary technology-using teachers figure out ways to use technology? A lot of it has to deal with their pedagogical creativity. From my own opinion, a lot of quality is directly correlated to creativity and it can be taught.
In my own teaching with preservice teachers, I typically ask them to have a SEMESTER LONG THEME which aligns with their topic area. This gives them more focus, and they begin to establish technology-enhanced learning resources as a unit. It also helps them really investigate one topic and see how many great resources are out there and begin the brainstorming process of "I could use that software in this way" and they begin to bounce ideas of each other and draw ideas from each other.
One of the limiting factors is pairing them up with similar interests. Although the trend is to move towards interdisciplinary, by at least pairing up grade levels (i.e., all elementary together) then we could work on the interdisciplinary push much easier.
Turn wired jack into wireless (3COM - XJack/XJAX).
APC Travel Power.
Digital Paper.
In my own teaching with preservice teachers, I typically ask them to have a SEMESTER LONG THEME which aligns with their topic area. This gives them more focus, and they begin to establish technology-enhanced learning resources as a unit. It also helps them really investigate one topic and see how many great resources are out there and begin the brainstorming process of "I could use that software in this way" and they begin to bounce ideas of each other and draw ideas from each other.
One of the limiting factors is pairing them up with similar interests. Although the trend is to move towards interdisciplinary, by at least pairing up grade levels (i.e., all elementary together) then we could work on the interdisciplinary push much easier.
Turn wired jack into wireless (3COM - XJack/XJAX).
APC Travel Power.
Digital Paper.
WOW - What a district!
At MACUL, one of the neatest things I heard was about this school that has THE technology set-up, that just makes your arms get goosebumps. The presenter first gave an overview of some of the "newer" technologies and then gave a case study example of THE tech school.
Ideas for new technologies:
Polycom Interactive Whiteboard (more than just a smartboard)
ThinClients - ClearCube.
Extended Batteries
Acer - Tablet PC (no swivel heads)
Biometric encryptions
GoSpeak - portable presenter, self contained, little personal A/V system, fairly big classroom, wireless mics, not mounts, portable, cafeteria, school play, teacher to teacher.
Bretford Cart - portable laptop system, secure laptop cabinet, wheel from room to room
Proxim - wireless access point, mesh wireless capabilities, use different points as a transport
NEC Projector - projection systems, carry with me, portable, 2.2 lbs, highest display, industries brightest display, remote control
KEYBOARDS: Keyboards, Trackballs, Keyboards on the smallest size
CASE STUDIES. Doctor's Charter School. IT Admin 3 months to prep an entire IT infrastructure. Building a school with a blank check and a blank slate. What are some of the new stuff they did?
Walk through the door, first thing you see is a series of LCD displays for announcements (parents, teachers, students). Interactive. Principals can type in and change the display. Lunch schedule, announcements, teacher location.
Classrooms. Interactive whiteboards, connected printer, and projector. PC for every student. ClearCube. Every single student has the device under their desk with a swing away monitor.
Wireless throughout the entire district. Teachers and students are set-up on different networks. You can ride on a public (students and parents) or private (teachers and staff) network. The network scans the computer before allowing it to access the network. Looks for viruses, content, etc... on the computer asking to connect.
Entire building. Wired for audio/video. Send streaming content to student desks. The principal comes through the video on each classroom.
Voice over IP in every single office. It extends through the district. They can ring your desk. As they build more charter, it seamlessly integrates as well.
Able to pull some of the best technology to this school district. EVERYTHING IS GOING WIRELESS. We're in a different age - don't rely on wires anymore.
Ideas for new technologies:
Polycom Interactive Whiteboard (more than just a smartboard)
ThinClients - ClearCube.
Extended Batteries
Acer - Tablet PC (no swivel heads)
Biometric encryptions
GoSpeak - portable presenter, self contained, little personal A/V system, fairly big classroom, wireless mics, not mounts, portable, cafeteria, school play, teacher to teacher.
Bretford Cart - portable laptop system, secure laptop cabinet, wheel from room to room
Proxim - wireless access point, mesh wireless capabilities, use different points as a transport
NEC Projector - projection systems, carry with me, portable, 2.2 lbs, highest display, industries brightest display, remote control
KEYBOARDS: Keyboards, Trackballs, Keyboards on the smallest size
CASE STUDIES. Doctor's Charter School. IT Admin 3 months to prep an entire IT infrastructure. Building a school with a blank check and a blank slate. What are some of the new stuff they did?
Walk through the door, first thing you see is a series of LCD displays for announcements (parents, teachers, students). Interactive. Principals can type in and change the display. Lunch schedule, announcements, teacher location.
Classrooms. Interactive whiteboards, connected printer, and projector. PC for every student. ClearCube. Every single student has the device under their desk with a swing away monitor.
Wireless throughout the entire district. Teachers and students are set-up on different networks. You can ride on a public (students and parents) or private (teachers and staff) network. The network scans the computer before allowing it to access the network. Looks for viruses, content, etc... on the computer asking to connect.
Entire building. Wired for audio/video. Send streaming content to student desks. The principal comes through the video on each classroom.
Voice over IP in every single office. It extends through the district. They can ring your desk. As they build more charter, it seamlessly integrates as well.
Able to pull some of the best technology to this school district. EVERYTHING IS GOING WIRELESS. We're in a different age - don't rely on wires anymore.
Simple Themes - KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid)
So interesting theme I've noticed throughout this conference: Making things simplier. Teachers won't use technology if it's not simple. How do we keep things simple? Well, first it means not being able to necessarily introduce the "bleeding edge" technologies right away.
It seems like anything we can do as educational technologists that's easy, free, or allows us to do something exciting for K12 students, we'll do it. I've also
It seems like anything we can do as educational technologists that's easy, free, or allows us to do something exciting for K12 students, we'll do it. I've also
NTeQ Lesson
Still at MACUL, these Freedom to Learn teachers utilized a 10 step aproach to designing a better lesson.
Their website handout is...
They specify that you need to be flexible. Always have a back-up plan.
They had some very broad overview ideas on their handout.
Computer Functions:
Spreadsheet:
Convert, Modify, Analyze, Calculate, Compare of Contrast, Estimate, Predict
Database:
Note to self- check out the 1:00 session on WORD. Mom would like this one.
STEP 1: Specify all your lesson objectives. (technology and not technology). Match your objectives to computer functions.
STEP 2: Computer functions that support your objectives. Make sure that you match these.
STEP 3: Specify the Problem. MAke it authentic, realistic, real-world events, from the students' world and let them suggest the problem.
STEP 4: Data Manipulation. Supply the data or help them find it. How will they manipulate. Perhaps job aids, or think sheets (questions and ideas for students - I love this term!). Make it as easy as possible to find the data. They really need to be able to identify the data. Searching is not the most important thing.
STEP 5: Results Presentation. How will they share/present the results. Printed reports, etc...
STEP 6: What activities while at the computer? entering the data manipulating, creating a report, grou7p?
STEP 7: Activities prior to comptuers. What do they need to do ahead of time? For teachers, the computer lab is limited. Key words for searching, collecting data, etc... Waste of your lab time. They should be prepared even if they have laptops.
STEP 8: After computers. Kids that finish early, how will you wrap it up? Closure? Next step?
STEP 9: Supporting activities? Addtional activities that support. MEaningful learning, etc...
STEP 10: Assessment. How will you know they've achieved the objectives?
It seems that they are using the Morrison and Lowther model which has specific lesson plan elements and even an online lesson planner. Which coordinates with their model. They also have links to their presentations. This model emphasized, student centered environment, use computer as a tool, solve real-world problems, learn content while solving problem. EMPHASIZE STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
It seems like we need to take the emphasis off the technology. The technology is a way to enhance the education. This was a great presentation on thinking about HOW to think/brainstorm about
One teacher emphasized using "Job Aids" which will answer any technology problems. Another teacher has the "reader" and the "doer" so one person reads and the other drives the mouse. These teachers emphasize the "job aid" and giving it to the students as you go over it. They debated on "Should the students have written plans?" They typically have something on paper.
I think more people need to think about the planning that goes into a technology lesson. It's not just go into the computers.
They came up with some more ideas:
M&M - Check this handout because it's got a great think sheet!
Tissue Comparisons
Unfortunately, I need to go meet up with my lunch crew, so I have to leave half-way through this presentation. I think they had some great ideas of lessons. I would recommend checking out the teacher's websites/their posts on the NTeQ lessons?
I’m back.
One of the teachers did a really nice presentation on using a map background and use the grids in order to place stars.
Use Microsoft Word to compare genres of literature by highlighting different nouns,
Use Microsoft Word for peer editing, topic sentences, comparing details, etc.. Help students think about details more. Give them a story and they need to think about adding details. Do a “Track Changes” in order to see the changes.
Again, I got to chime in and add my thoughts. I recommended thinking about “hidden text” for giving directions. This is a really great way to provide students with a “template” with
Another teacher used the preamble to put it into a chart. The phrase is then matched with a picture and the students needed to give a rationale about why it applied. Also, use the readability tool to highlight different areas. It comes across as a 12th grade level. Give them the goal to lower the readability to make it easier for others to understand. Think about using the thesaurus. This would be great for a student project where teachers would ask the students to make it easier for immigrants to understand information. How would people who have difficulties with English be able to understand our laws and democracy. Or have them help younger students who need to know it for the MEAP.
Their website handout is...
They specify that you need to be flexible. Always have a back-up plan.
They had some very broad overview ideas on their handout.
Computer Functions:
Spreadsheet:
Convert, Modify, Analyze, Calculate, Compare of Contrast, Estimate, Predict
Database:
Note to self- check out the 1:00 session on WORD. Mom would like this one.
STEP 1: Specify all your lesson objectives. (technology and not technology). Match your objectives to computer functions.
STEP 2: Computer functions that support your objectives. Make sure that you match these.
STEP 3: Specify the Problem. MAke it authentic, realistic, real-world events, from the students' world and let them suggest the problem.
STEP 4: Data Manipulation. Supply the data or help them find it. How will they manipulate. Perhaps job aids, or think sheets (questions and ideas for students - I love this term!). Make it as easy as possible to find the data. They really need to be able to identify the data. Searching is not the most important thing.
STEP 5: Results Presentation. How will they share/present the results. Printed reports, etc...
STEP 6: What activities while at the computer? entering the data manipulating, creating a report, grou7p?
STEP 7: Activities prior to comptuers. What do they need to do ahead of time? For teachers, the computer lab is limited. Key words for searching, collecting data, etc... Waste of your lab time. They should be prepared even if they have laptops.
STEP 8: After computers. Kids that finish early, how will you wrap it up? Closure? Next step?
STEP 9: Supporting activities? Addtional activities that support. MEaningful learning, etc...
STEP 10: Assessment. How will you know they've achieved the objectives?
It seems that they are using the Morrison and Lowther model which has specific lesson plan elements and even an online lesson planner. Which coordinates with their model. They also have links to their presentations. This model emphasized, student centered environment, use computer as a tool, solve real-world problems, learn content while solving problem. EMPHASIZE STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
It seems like we need to take the emphasis off the technology. The technology is a way to enhance the education. This was a great presentation on thinking about HOW to think/brainstorm about
One teacher emphasized using "Job Aids" which will answer any technology problems. Another teacher has the "reader" and the "doer" so one person reads and the other drives the mouse. These teachers emphasize the "job aid" and giving it to the students as you go over it. They debated on "Should the students have written plans?" They typically have something on paper.
I think more people need to think about the planning that goes into a technology lesson. It's not just go into the computers.
They came up with some more ideas:
M&M - Check this handout because it's got a great think sheet!
Tissue Comparisons
Unfortunately, I need to go meet up with my lunch crew, so I have to leave half-way through this presentation. I think they had some great ideas of lessons. I would recommend checking out the teacher's websites/their posts on the NTeQ lessons?
I’m back.
One of the teachers did a really nice presentation on using a map background and use the grids in order to place stars.
Use Microsoft Word to compare genres of literature by highlighting different nouns,
Use Microsoft Word for peer editing, topic sentences, comparing details, etc.. Help students think about details more. Give them a story and they need to think about adding details. Do a “Track Changes” in order to see the changes.
Again, I got to chime in and add my thoughts. I recommended thinking about “hidden text” for giving directions. This is a really great way to provide students with a “template” with
Another teacher used the preamble to put it into a chart. The phrase is then matched with a picture and the students needed to give a rationale about why it applied. Also, use the readability tool to highlight different areas. It comes across as a 12th grade level. Give them the goal to lower the readability to make it easier for others to understand. Think about using the thesaurus. This would be great for a student project where teachers would ask the students to make it easier for immigrants to understand information. How would people who have difficulties with English be able to understand our laws and democracy. Or have them help younger students who need to know it for the MEAP.
Podcasting, Vodcasting, and Screencasting
Visiting Will Richardson's Wiki with the rww to edit.
Blogging supplies conversation. You need to find a way to make it more interactive.
This changes from students as students TO students as teachers They are now teaching about history - they become a teacher like when they mke a video - it becomes more internalized.
RSS - extremely powerful technology to pull information to you - a subscription. Regular programming schedule.
Loved his format - black background with white font. This is not just for iPods.
iTunes (there are other places to go, but it's the best place to find out what's out there. A listing of all the different podcasts.
Check out on iTunes, but there are more. There are students teaching with audio.
Radio WillowWeb - podcasting about your place (where you live).
Bob Sprinkle - Room 208. Very elementary. There is a blog, museum guide, etc...
Podcast with audio and other files (pdfs). The French PodClass. The Podcast includes pdfs.
(EDUTOPIA - with art. Virtual tour. Online site with the audio. The art museum did links. They could also listen to the students.) Great idea.
EPN The Education Podcast Network - WOW! All education podcasts.
Tim Wilson also has an excellent podcast.
Things you need:
1. Digital Recorder
2. Audacity
3. FeedBurner (server)
Dave Cormier - 1pm Eastern Time - World bridges.com
Skype - use skype to interview people, record it, and publish. It's not hard. WOW!
PowerGramo (add-on, allows you to record it).
Audacity fades, cut, audio, get the screencast. Export as mp3. Add meta data if you want.
Turn around time is about 15 minutes. Skype it up. ;) You can get 5 people.
Ed Tech Coast to Coast. Chatting while talking to prep. Garage Band.
Vidcasting...The next step up. The most popular vidcast is Rocket Boom.
Mash-Up - taking audio and putting it together.
Chapters of a book, news shows,
OURMEDIA.ORG - SERVER SPACE!!!
RSS Feed - FeedBurner.
iLife has server space too.
Copyright Issues: Creative Commons.org (creators of content can assign their own copyright) You can use this an way you want, but give me credit. Lawrence Lessig? Wrote
For video, save it as an mp4 file. Camtasia.
SCREENCASTING********************************
The best way to learn something is to teach it. If we can get the kids to teach what we're trying to teach them, they will understand the process. Taking a movie of everything that's happening on your movie screen.
Look into captivate.
How cool! I got to talk in Will Richardson's lecture.
Wikipedia Screencast. Check out this screencast of John Udell. He's teaching about Wikipedia. He's thought about it.
For me, I use screencasts to explain projects so I can show examples, how to use specific peices of software, and to teach about specific concepts. It's not a bad way to integrate Powerpoint, Internet, etc...
My students in EDCI 271 used Camtasia to explain how to use different pieces of software. It was great for problem solving as Will indicated.
Windows Media Encoder is free. However, I MUST have Camtastia, the newest version. You can do a video of yourself and do a
Will Richardson focuses on tools are not conversation pieces. How can we use this to ENGAGE our students.
Blogging supplies conversation. You need to find a way to make it more interactive.
This changes from students as students TO students as teachers They are now teaching about history - they become a teacher like when they mke a video - it becomes more internalized.
RSS - extremely powerful technology to pull information to you - a subscription. Regular programming schedule.
Loved his format - black background with white font. This is not just for iPods.
iTunes (there are other places to go, but it's the best place to find out what's out there. A listing of all the different podcasts.
Check out on iTunes, but there are more. There are students teaching with audio.
Radio WillowWeb - podcasting about your place (where you live).
Bob Sprinkle - Room 208. Very elementary. There is a blog, museum guide, etc...
Podcast with audio and other files (pdfs). The French PodClass. The Podcast includes pdfs.
(EDUTOPIA - with art. Virtual tour. Online site with the audio. The art museum did links. They could also listen to the students.) Great idea.
EPN The Education Podcast Network - WOW! All education podcasts.
Tim Wilson also has an excellent podcast.
Things you need:
1. Digital Recorder
2. Audacity
3. FeedBurner (server)
Dave Cormier - 1pm Eastern Time - World bridges.com
Skype - use skype to interview people, record it, and publish. It's not hard. WOW!
PowerGramo (add-on, allows you to record it).
Audacity fades, cut, audio, get the screencast. Export as mp3. Add meta data if you want.
Turn around time is about 15 minutes. Skype it up. ;) You can get 5 people.
Ed Tech Coast to Coast. Chatting while talking to prep. Garage Band.
Vidcasting...The next step up. The most popular vidcast is Rocket Boom.
Mash-Up - taking audio and putting it together.
Chapters of a book, news shows,
OURMEDIA.ORG - SERVER SPACE!!!
RSS Feed - FeedBurner.
iLife has server space too.
Copyright Issues: Creative Commons.org (creators of content can assign their own copyright) You can use this an way you want, but give me credit. Lawrence Lessig? Wrote
free culture. Fair use will cover a lot, but GET SCHOOLED!
For video, save it as an mp4 file. Camtasia.
SCREENCASTING********************************
The best way to learn something is to teach it. If we can get the kids to teach what we're trying to teach them, they will understand the process. Taking a movie of everything that's happening on your movie screen.
Look into captivate.
How cool! I got to talk in Will Richardson's lecture.
Wikipedia Screencast. Check out this screencast of John Udell. He's teaching about Wikipedia. He's thought about it.
For me, I use screencasts to explain projects so I can show examples, how to use specific peices of software, and to teach about specific concepts. It's not a bad way to integrate Powerpoint, Internet, etc...
My students in EDCI 271 used Camtasia to explain how to use different pieces of software. It was great for problem solving as Will indicated.
Windows Media Encoder is free. However, I MUST have Camtastia, the newest version. You can do a video of yourself and do a
picture in pictureeffect which is really good. Camtasia lets me export as a vidcast. I can use this program to transfer all of my video files. However, Will talks about thinking about it ahead of time. You need to script it. It's very important. However, I use it as a casual piece of software.
Will Richardson focuses on tools are not conversation pieces. How can we use this to ENGAGE our students.
as opportunities to TEACH. When we have our students teach the material, they understand it better.
Storybook Online
Super cool site. Think about having students just write one paragraph and allow other students to post and comment. (SImilar to merry-go-round stories where you have students get up and move to another student's computer to add to their story). Check on the tech savvy educator's blog for links to all this stuff.
Marvel.com (Comic books)
Marvel.com (Comic books)
MACUL 2006 - For the novice
One of the most interesting things is to observe my mother (who is a second grade teacher that doesn't necessarily feel comfortable with technology, but WOW you should see her in the classroom! I have never seen a more passionate, and compassionate teacher.). I use her as my inspiration. What are teachers really looking for? How can we make it more applicable for teachers to show them the possibilities for technology to take them beyond where they want to go?
Some of my thoughts are really becoming focused on connecting it directly to their classroom. After reading Dr. Peg Ertmer's most recent paper on Teacher Beliefs (in Educational Technology Research and Development), it really seems that we need the teachers to "buy-into" the innovation. I want to come back to this, because I've found some really great ideas by coming here. One of the more interesting sessions I went to was with a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan. Back for more later.
Free Blogging Tools: I think.
Another great search engine for technology: Technorati
The TechSavvy Educator mentions free and non-comerical as important for educators to accept technology sites or use it. Otherwise, they don't have education in mind. MY thoughts? Even though there is profit behind it, sometimes profit drives it: Think Microsoft and Apple. Some of their developed materials and supprt are fantastic even though profit drives it.
Sky - Constellation Searches
Stellarium
Celestia - virtual tour.
Heavens-Above.com (Doesn't spam)
Possible uses with mimio board.
MACUL - Battle Creek Folks
Some of my thoughts are really becoming focused on connecting it directly to their classroom. After reading Dr. Peg Ertmer's most recent paper on Teacher Beliefs (in Educational Technology Research and Development), it really seems that we need the teachers to "buy-into" the innovation. I want to come back to this, because I've found some really great ideas by coming here. One of the more interesting sessions I went to was with a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan. Back for more later.
Free Blogging Tools: I think.
Another great search engine for technology: Technorati
The TechSavvy Educator mentions free and non-comerical as important for educators to accept technology sites or use it. Otherwise, they don't have education in mind. MY thoughts? Even though there is profit behind it, sometimes profit drives it: Think Microsoft and Apple. Some of their developed materials and supprt are fantastic even though profit drives it.
Sky - Constellation Searches
Stellarium
Celestia - virtual tour.
Heavens-Above.com (Doesn't spam)
Possible uses with mimio board.
MACUL - Battle Creek Folks
TechSavvy Educator - MACUL 2006
I'm here at the MACUL conference and I'm in the TechSavvy Educator. It's fairly interesting. I'm getting some new ideas. He's talking about blogs as a great way to show that the material is up-to-date. He also stresses that the material needs to be easy for teachers to use. I completely agree. It needs to be easy. However, for anyone to use it should be easy - that's the trend of technology. Why use something that will make things more difficult. We need to make sure as we're using technology as a means to improve, enhance, or make things easier.
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Research Line: What came first, my teaching or my research? (chicken or egg)
So in my latest 660 class (I've had so many of these, but they're all good) which is a doctoral seminar, I got to thinking about my research line/agenda.
I've always had a thing for technology integration. It allows me to be incredibly creative and take my mind further than anywhere before. I started out with K-12 integration. I loved thinking of ideas. For my student teaching experience, I had my first graders creating weather news reports and then I videotaped them. But that wasn't the ingenious part. I also wanted the backdrop like a real weather studio where the picture of the sun appears in the background. Since we didn't have the green screen :) I used a PowerPoint presentation with a picture of Michigan and animated clipart. I projected this image onto the screen with a LCD projector and placed the students in front of the screen. Lukily, the picture of Michigan had water (which was light blue, almost white) so there was no funky image projected onto the students. It turned out super cute and the kids had a copy of their own weather forecast when we finished.
It makes me come alive along with my audience. I am incredibly passionate about what I do and I love the technologies becuase it introduces a new possibility into the classroom. That's why, when a new technology comes out, I want to know all about and think about how we could use it in the classroom. It's a new way to address learning and make it exciting.
Therefore, if I had to pick my one research area, it would be technology integration into educational learning experiences (especially creative ones). More specifically, I really enjoy anything with preservice teachers, exciting them about technology. I think it's all about the manner in which you teach. The university faculty are some of the most important influences on the way these students teach. That why I want to be a professor instead of a K-12 school teacher. Think of all the children I will be impacting by preparing better teachers. I'm not just teaching technology, I'm teaching teaching.
I've always had a thing for technology integration. It allows me to be incredibly creative and take my mind further than anywhere before. I started out with K-12 integration. I loved thinking of ideas. For my student teaching experience, I had my first graders creating weather news reports and then I videotaped them. But that wasn't the ingenious part. I also wanted the backdrop like a real weather studio where the picture of the sun appears in the background. Since we didn't have the green screen :) I used a PowerPoint presentation with a picture of Michigan and animated clipart. I projected this image onto the screen with a LCD projector and placed the students in front of the screen. Lukily, the picture of Michigan had water (which was light blue, almost white) so there was no funky image projected onto the students. It turned out super cute and the kids had a copy of their own weather forecast when we finished.
It makes me come alive along with my audience. I am incredibly passionate about what I do and I love the technologies becuase it introduces a new possibility into the classroom. That's why, when a new technology comes out, I want to know all about and think about how we could use it in the classroom. It's a new way to address learning and make it exciting.
Therefore, if I had to pick my one research area, it would be technology integration into educational learning experiences (especially creative ones). More specifically, I really enjoy anything with preservice teachers, exciting them about technology. I think it's all about the manner in which you teach. The university faculty are some of the most important influences on the way these students teach. That why I want to be a professor instead of a K-12 school teacher. Think of all the children I will be impacting by preparing better teachers. I'm not just teaching technology, I'm teaching teaching.
271 - Philosophy from Week One: Learning skills and integration, incorporating vision, reflection and collaboration - the perfect combo for learning.
So, I'm thinking that 271 is going better than I first thought. After the first class, I was kind of bummed, because my students just sat there in awe, not asking any questions. I was afraid I had totally lost them and it was WAY over their heads. We had some really cute ideas. Luckily, I had all early childhood education students so I was able to really focus the software and aim of the course. Hans took all the Agricultural Education students. I really think you need to connect education more directly to students. This is shown throughout education. Many accomplish this with a smaller group, but if you can tailor the instruction to better meet a whole group of students, isn't that better? More ROI. :)
Anyways, I was so pleased with my first planned course. I first had my students draw a representation of themselves in a Paint program (to learn how to use Paint). Next, I had them save those in the Public Folder (to get them used to saving things and where to save them) so they could present their drawing to the class. As they were explaining, students were supposed to take notes (using Word or Works or Notepad) of students who had similarities to them. Then each student came up and we used Kidspiration to draw connections to one another to emphasize how we share common bonds. I wanted to build a community of learners.
Since the course is still fuzzy to me, it was difficult to explain. It felt like I was going by the seat of my pants, but I LOVE LOVE LOVE being able to be creative and think of these types of things.
I was also able to introduce them to WebCT Vista (where they were supposed to post an introduction of themselves), Blogs (using Elgg.net), and the course in general. We just reviewed how the cases would work and viewed the three movies files I had which were the first case. I'll talk about those in a separate blog.
I am also having the students keep their own blog in Elgg. They subscribed to our EDCI 271 community where there will be a community blog (for course suggestions or it could be used for debates or posting about different technologies and how we could use them) and a community wiki (where we will define ideal technology integration and come up with one class definition). Overall, I really want to emphasize learning the technologies while accomplishing technology integration visions. I think this may be the key. They are learning both skills and integration techniques all at the same time while reflecting and collaborating. I discovered this accidentally, but what a brainstorm! I love it! Plus it's students centered. I asked them to answer a survey that lets me know what technologies they wanted to learn about. Therefore, I can tailor the course to meet their wants and needs. The important thing is to remain flexible.
Anyways, I was so pleased with my first planned course. I first had my students draw a representation of themselves in a Paint program (to learn how to use Paint). Next, I had them save those in the Public Folder (to get them used to saving things and where to save them) so they could present their drawing to the class. As they were explaining, students were supposed to take notes (using Word or Works or Notepad) of students who had similarities to them. Then each student came up and we used Kidspiration to draw connections to one another to emphasize how we share common bonds. I wanted to build a community of learners.
Since the course is still fuzzy to me, it was difficult to explain. It felt like I was going by the seat of my pants, but I LOVE LOVE LOVE being able to be creative and think of these types of things.
I was also able to introduce them to WebCT Vista (where they were supposed to post an introduction of themselves), Blogs (using Elgg.net), and the course in general. We just reviewed how the cases would work and viewed the three movies files I had which were the first case. I'll talk about those in a separate blog.
I am also having the students keep their own blog in Elgg. They subscribed to our EDCI 271 community where there will be a community blog (for course suggestions or it could be used for debates or posting about different technologies and how we could use them) and a community wiki (where we will define ideal technology integration and come up with one class definition). Overall, I really want to emphasize learning the technologies while accomplishing technology integration visions. I think this may be the key. They are learning both skills and integration techniques all at the same time while reflecting and collaborating. I discovered this accidentally, but what a brainstorm! I love it! Plus it's students centered. I asked them to answer a survey that lets me know what technologies they wanted to learn about. Therefore, I can tailor the course to meet their wants and needs. The important thing is to remain flexible.
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Research Agenda Interests
Notes from PodCast Lectures
Expert mentorng -FAQs addressed by video.
Blog wiki?
Observations via video conferencing.
Teacher think alouds.
Electronic support system for training.
Portals, personalization,
podcasting to practice speeches and download and evaluate.
Choose you own adventure podcasts.
Think of technology and brainstorm.
Technology is a way to socially build knowledge.
Have exemplary technology teachers be distinguished speakers in 271.
Dissemination needs to be for research. Blog about findings. RSS.
classroom to lab to pactice. Kids are so much better and encourages then to be critica of education and incoporate into their own pedagogy.
Intellectual property is open source.
ideas by open source and interdiscciplinary. Not intellectual property.
Podcasting is a buzz word.
content aquisition is supported by content publishing.
look up edison services. Auto delivery. Sound sync tools.(tools for tours).
Audio the lecture. They respond with voice. Download and grade. Think edci 270 final.
Whats on your ipod.
ilife. Track intellectual progess. Digital archive of their lives.
Meta data
type in blog for meetings etc... Keep everything.
Carry less devices. Simple and effecive to track your digital stuff.
Think preschool and fingerpaints. Life ling storage. The role of archivoing to a system level.
MAKE A DISTINGUISHED SPEAKER PODCAST FOR ED TECH.
What are the needs and realistic realities of the classroom.
Eett funds from government?
COSN AND ISTE. ETAN. Share best practices.
technology is a moving target. Think about society and competing with wolrds.
Expanding learning is to give up responsibility to students. Kids are more self critical. Better practices. Ask kids what they want to learn. Develop a placement cycle.
Just because they are connected doesnt mean they are uptodate.
Help school districts with marrying tech with curriculum, assessment, to make strategic decisions.
Technology is the catayst to change education. Transform todays school from yesterdays school to develop tomorows students.
WEB 2
universal and challanenge slider
The reason acot made it like new teachers is a complete overhaul. Whats better slowly introducing or emersion?
Acot was restrictive. All teachers facing similar problems. Computers were relativley new. Not really model of what tech integration looks like in schools.
Longitudinal studies of how teachers first sign up. Incentive interest shown the positive in stident achieve. Mandate.
Computers may be novel whicj could show ueof motivation.
You have to look at the individual as opposed to the organization.
Blog wiki?
Observations via video conferencing.
Teacher think alouds.
Electronic support system for training.
Portals, personalization,
podcasting to practice speeches and download and evaluate.
Choose you own adventure podcasts.
Think of technology and brainstorm.
Technology is a way to socially build knowledge.
Have exemplary technology teachers be distinguished speakers in 271.
Dissemination needs to be for research. Blog about findings. RSS.
classroom to lab to pactice. Kids are so much better and encourages then to be critica of education and incoporate into their own pedagogy.
Intellectual property is open source.
ideas by open source and interdiscciplinary. Not intellectual property.
Podcasting is a buzz word.
content aquisition is supported by content publishing.
look up edison services. Auto delivery. Sound sync tools.(tools for tours).
Audio the lecture. They respond with voice. Download and grade. Think edci 270 final.
Whats on your ipod.
ilife. Track intellectual progess. Digital archive of their lives.
Meta data
type in blog for meetings etc... Keep everything.
Carry less devices. Simple and effecive to track your digital stuff.
Think preschool and fingerpaints. Life ling storage. The role of archivoing to a system level.
MAKE A DISTINGUISHED SPEAKER PODCAST FOR ED TECH.
What are the needs and realistic realities of the classroom.
Eett funds from government?
COSN AND ISTE. ETAN. Share best practices.
technology is a moving target. Think about society and competing with wolrds.
Expanding learning is to give up responsibility to students. Kids are more self critical. Better practices. Ask kids what they want to learn. Develop a placement cycle.
Just because they are connected doesnt mean they are uptodate.
Help school districts with marrying tech with curriculum, assessment, to make strategic decisions.
Technology is the catayst to change education. Transform todays school from yesterdays school to develop tomorows students.
WEB 2
universal and challanenge slider
The reason acot made it like new teachers is a complete overhaul. Whats better slowly introducing or emersion?
Acot was restrictive. All teachers facing similar problems. Computers were relativley new. Not really model of what tech integration looks like in schools.
Longitudinal studies of how teachers first sign up. Incentive interest shown the positive in stident achieve. Mandate.
Computers may be novel whicj could show ueof motivation.
You have to look at the individual as opposed to the organization.
270 Ideas
Give lesson plans - identify theory or strategies. Or add technology to lesson after discussion on student centered practices.
Model student-centered and teacher-centered lessons for PSTs to learn comp skills. Ask them to reflect. Emphasize reflection.
Problem solving process of expert technology using teachers.
270. As soon as you enter these doors you will only think of teaching.
Creative problem solving requires different ideation strategies to encourage and facilitate. No evaluation just brainstorming. Everything goes.
Factors - attitude cognitive ability and experience.
PSTs as change agents for tech integration and pedagogical change.
Model student-centered and teacher-centered lessons for PSTs to learn comp skills. Ask them to reflect. Emphasize reflection.
Problem solving process of expert technology using teachers.
270. As soon as you enter these doors you will only think of teaching.
Creative problem solving requires different ideation strategies to encourage and facilitate. No evaluation just brainstorming. Everything goes.
Factors - attitude cognitive ability and experience.
PSTs as change agents for tech integration and pedagogical change.
EDCI 270 & 271 Syllabus Ideas
EDCI 271 and Online 270 Syllabus Ideas.
Wiki with beginning literacy or older summaries and critiques.
Video observations.
Teacher reflection podcast.
Video conference with technology for tots.
Tiers can apply to 271.
Software/Hardware to introduce:
*kidspiration
*kidpix
*tablet
*palm
*pocket pc
*clickers
*smartboard
*ipod
*podcasting
*blogging
*wiki
*course manage. Software
*leap-pad
*paint
*hyperstudio?
*fun brain
*brain pop
*internet games
*internet software
*TECHNOLOGY ENHANCES COMMUNICATION AND SOCIALLY BUILT KNOWLEDGE.
*alpha smarts
*voice recordings
*video camera
*digital camera
*cell phones
*gaggle.net
*breeze
*thinkquest
*ebooks
*moviemaker
*making cds/dvds
*vcr
*laptops
*gps
*tv
*tivo
*camtasia
*macromedia captivate
*cd-rom software
*frontpage
EDCI 271
*develop their own technology workshop. Perhaps using camtasia?
*technology extravaganza.
*develop lesson plan template.
*employ PIE checklist.
*ask Hans to switch for early ed.
*view modeling of a technology lesson.
*work with technology to interact with preK. (think of opportunity for tech and ag ed)
ISTE Standards in a portfolio.
*discussion of technology integration - when to use and how?
*assess and evalute technologies - make up evaluation checklist together.
*case study on ethical, legal, responsibility of tech.
*develop a vision of tech integration.
*view good and bad examples of technology use. VISIONQUEST.
***MODELING, OBSERVATION, FIELD EXPERIENCE, REFLECTION, REFLEXIVE, BRAINSTORMING WITH TEACHERS, SKILLS, PEDAGOGICAL BELIEFS,
how do I make my classroom constructivist?
Wiki with beginning literacy or older summaries and critiques.
Video observations.
Teacher reflection podcast.
Video conference with technology for tots.
Tiers can apply to 271.
Software/Hardware to introduce:
*kidspiration
*kidpix
*tablet
*palm
*pocket pc
*clickers
*smartboard
*ipod
*podcasting
*blogging
*wiki
*course manage. Software
*leap-pad
*paint
*hyperstudio?
*fun brain
*brain pop
*internet games
*internet software
*TECHNOLOGY ENHANCES COMMUNICATION AND SOCIALLY BUILT KNOWLEDGE.
*alpha smarts
*voice recordings
*video camera
*digital camera
*cell phones
*gaggle.net
*breeze
*thinkquest
*ebooks
*moviemaker
*making cds/dvds
*vcr
*laptops
*gps
*tv
*tivo
*camtasia
*macromedia captivate
*cd-rom software
*frontpage
EDCI 271
*develop their own technology workshop. Perhaps using camtasia?
*technology extravaganza.
*develop lesson plan template.
*employ PIE checklist.
*ask Hans to switch for early ed.
*view modeling of a technology lesson.
*work with technology to interact with preK. (think of opportunity for tech and ag ed)
ISTE Standards in a portfolio.
*discussion of technology integration - when to use and how?
*assess and evalute technologies - make up evaluation checklist together.
*case study on ethical, legal, responsibility of tech.
*develop a vision of tech integration.
*view good and bad examples of technology use. VISIONQUEST.
***MODELING, OBSERVATION, FIELD EXPERIENCE, REFLECTION, REFLEXIVE, BRAINSTORMING WITH TEACHERS, SKILLS, PEDAGOGICAL BELIEFS,
how do I make my classroom constructivist?
When I first started thinking about my DISSERTATION!!!!
Ideas
*interview recently hired to see where the gap is in preserving education. What is the biggest shock in terms of technology after being educated in preservice program? What didn't they prepare you for?
*Survey of what they think preservice teachers need to see in terms of technology integration. Would you be willing to be follow-up interviewed to gather more information?
*How does using technology enhance effectiveness?
**How do we alter pedagogical beliefs to fully integrate technology as part of their constructivist beliefs?
*What process do teachers go through to get from novice to expert?
*What process do expert technology users go through in order to get to this quality technology integration?
-is it affecting beliefs first?
-are the stages?
-different processes for everyone?
-make the process more individualized?
-test to see which way works best for each person?
-do they need to believe in the merits? Pedagogical?
-do they need to see it at work?
-do they need to learn skills? Then integration? Then methods? Then field experiences?
-do they need to see the connections to their field and subject matter before they will believe and then will integrate?
-what are the different factors that help people learn how to integrate technology in a quality fashion?
***I can take these processes and see which ones are the most effective in preparing teachers to effectively integrate technology. Perhaps have them choose their own process and document the process using a portfolio. Different workshops, mini-courses, opportunities for working with professors, integrating it into their other teacher education courses.
POTENTIAL QUESTIONS:
-What do you think preservice education should look like?
-Describe the process you went through to move from a novice technology integrationist to an expert?
-What is your current view of technology? And how does this influence your pedagogy?
-Can you give me an example of how you integrated technology in an exemplary way?
-What forms of professional development aided b
neilson survey.
*interview recently hired to see where the gap is in preserving education. What is the biggest shock in terms of technology after being educated in preservice program? What didn't they prepare you for?
*Survey of what they think preservice teachers need to see in terms of technology integration. Would you be willing to be follow-up interviewed to gather more information?
*How does using technology enhance effectiveness?
**How do we alter pedagogical beliefs to fully integrate technology as part of their constructivist beliefs?
*What process do teachers go through to get from novice to expert?
*What process do expert technology users go through in order to get to this quality technology integration?
-is it affecting beliefs first?
-are the stages?
-different processes for everyone?
-make the process more individualized?
-test to see which way works best for each person?
-do they need to believe in the merits? Pedagogical?
-do they need to see it at work?
-do they need to learn skills? Then integration? Then methods? Then field experiences?
-do they need to see the connections to their field and subject matter before they will believe and then will integrate?
-what are the different factors that help people learn how to integrate technology in a quality fashion?
***I can take these processes and see which ones are the most effective in preparing teachers to effectively integrate technology. Perhaps have them choose their own process and document the process using a portfolio. Different workshops, mini-courses, opportunities for working with professors, integrating it into their other teacher education courses.
POTENTIAL QUESTIONS:
-What do you think preservice education should look like?
-Describe the process you went through to move from a novice technology integrationist to an expert?
-What is your current view of technology? And how does this influence your pedagogy?
-Can you give me an example of how you integrated technology in an exemplary way?
-What forms of professional development aided b
neilson survey.
EDCI 270 Online and EDCI 271 - AUTHENTIC TECHNOLOGY!
So...My newest ideas are for EDCI 271. I really want to make this learning experience fantastic for my PSTs (Preservice Teachers) and have them interact with K-12 students using technology. After visiting my dad's school today, I really feel even more compelled to use more examples of technology. Here are some of the ideas I discussed with Jeff Flynn:
------
Wiki: Use a wiki to conduct literature circles. Students with reading comprehension problems work together to develop a summary - changing and altering as they see fit.
------
Elgg: Parent Forum, using the blog as a portfolio including artifacts.
------
Video conferencing: PSTs (preservice teachers) will hear what K-12 students think about technology, technology use in schools, and how they feel teachers should use technology.
-----
Audio conferencing: Through Skype/Gizmo to discuss things with K-12 students.
-----
K-12 students are using Media Blender to make State Reports. Perhaps my PSTs could give the students feedback on their projects.
-----
Perhaps work with small groups and use the Elgg, so they can view each other’s blog.
----
Moodle – large group, free flowing.Everone can see!
-----
PodCasting. How can I use this? Perhaps to give the state feedback? Or to record Jeff and kids, and teachers (especially ones at Bryant) to see how they are using technology in their classrooms. Think NECC Podcasting Outstanding Apple Educator Interviews... :) PSTs and K-12ers could also use Auduicity to record.
------
Fantastic Early Education use of iPods: Multimedia running record. Although Jeff suggests iRiver, instead of iPod.
-----
MY THOUGHTS:
Have PSTs videotape HOW to use the software to present to other teachers.
Ask K-12ers: What makes a good teacher? How do you enjoy using technology? What have been your favorite uses of the computer in class?
Help to improve their state reports. Give them feedback.
Pair my PSTs with one small group of students. They work together as more of a “pen pal” type situation. Exchanging and talking with them. Monitoring their progress. That way if some students are more talkative than others, etc…. We can use all: Moodle, Elgg, Podcating
Could be similar to the tutoring or homework help.
Distance Education is the answer to collaboration between Universities, ISTs, PSTs, and K-12 students. Remember, Technology is the catalyst for communication in terms of socially shared knowledge. Diversity, group work, constructivism are all facets of this new form of education: Systemic change!
------
Jeff Flynn, the computer teacher at Pattengill Elementary where my father is principal is doing some pretty amazing things with the 3-5th grade students. Check out this promo on up-and-coming tech stuff from Jeff:
------
Wiki: Use a wiki to conduct literature circles. Students with reading comprehension problems work together to develop a summary - changing and altering as they see fit.
------
Elgg: Parent Forum, using the blog as a portfolio including artifacts.
------
Video conferencing: PSTs (preservice teachers) will hear what K-12 students think about technology, technology use in schools, and how they feel teachers should use technology.
-----
Audio conferencing: Through Skype/Gizmo to discuss things with K-12 students.
-----
K-12 students are using Media Blender to make State Reports. Perhaps my PSTs could give the students feedback on their projects.
-----
Perhaps work with small groups and use the Elgg, so they can view each other’s blog.
----
Moodle – large group, free flowing.Everone can see!
-----
PodCasting. How can I use this? Perhaps to give the state feedback? Or to record Jeff and kids, and teachers (especially ones at Bryant) to see how they are using technology in their classrooms. Think NECC Podcasting Outstanding Apple Educator Interviews... :) PSTs and K-12ers could also use Auduicity to record.
------
Fantastic Early Education use of iPods: Multimedia running record. Although Jeff suggests iRiver, instead of iPod.
-----
MY THOUGHTS:
Have PSTs videotape HOW to use the software to present to other teachers.
Ask K-12ers: What makes a good teacher? How do you enjoy using technology? What have been your favorite uses of the computer in class?
Help to improve their state reports. Give them feedback.
Pair my PSTs with one small group of students. They work together as more of a “pen pal” type situation. Exchanging and talking with them. Monitoring their progress. That way if some students are more talkative than others, etc…. We can use all: Moodle, Elgg, Podcating
Could be similar to the tutoring or homework help.
Distance Education is the answer to collaboration between Universities, ISTs, PSTs, and K-12 students. Remember, Technology is the catalyst for communication in terms of socially shared knowledge. Diversity, group work, constructivism are all facets of this new form of education: Systemic change!
------
Jeff Flynn, the computer teacher at Pattengill Elementary where my father is principal is doing some pretty amazing things with the 3-5th grade students. Check out this promo on up-and-coming tech stuff from Jeff:
If you have the chance check out the podcast in the blog, <http://technosavvy.org/?p=329> it and interview with the lead creator of moodle, which is open sourced as is elgg the next thing I am going to mention.
I would also encourage you to check out http://worldbridges.com/courses/listenandwatch/. It is our Elgg portfolio project. Feel free to register if you wish, it isn't a big deal and we could remove you if you wish later. elgg.net is the home group for that and that may be an online community you may want to check out.
www.edtechtalk.com and worldbridges.com are websites of a group who are working on webcasting and podcasts. Mostly they are the work of Jeff Lebow and Dave Cormier. The elgg guys are interviewed in podcast #8 <http://edtechtalk.com/node/38>. We have college people from Washington State, Oberlin, and teachers from Australia, Japan, Korea, and a lot from Canada. Skype in and join us from some of the conversations next year. It is a pretty wide open conversation with many contributing to the conference calls which are recorded and posted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)